We had an interesting discussion on the repeal of the 17th Amendment at our BPOU convention on Saturday. The more I think about the idea, the more I like it. I like it first of all because we are a republican form of government, not a democracy. This would remind people that it is so. Secondly, it would reduce the amount of money and time spent on campaigns because we would eliminate the need for a senatorial election. Third, and perhaps most important, it would renew interest in our local elections, because our state house and senate members and/or governor would be responsible for appointing our U.S. Senators. Fourth, as Jim Knoblach brought up, it may remove the need or desire to impose term limits, because our local elected officials change office more frequently, and therefore our appointee would change more frequently. Since our local officials already reflect our local desires, at least as close as we can get out of those who choose to run, I do not think there would be a drastic difference in whom the state would choose, over whom the people would vote for.
My resolution on eliminating primary elections was tabled before it could even be discussed.
No comments:
Post a Comment